Drones May Set Off a Flurry of Lawsuits

21 February 2012
By

The New York Times seems pretty anti sUAS use, almost daily reports of worries. We think they are operating in the manufacturers twilight zone. They believe the capability hype. Perhaps they ought to be flying a couple of their own before to get a handle on how things really work. What people say is possible and what is actually possible are quite far apart.

By SOMINI SENGUPTA

Opening up the skies to the civilian use of drones in the United States is likely to lead to a number of new questions about surveillance by electronic means.

Unmanned aerial vehicles can not only take photos and videos, they can also spot heat sources, read car license plate numbers, and perhaps soon capture other information about people and things down below.

The Center for Democracy and Technology, a Washington-based civil liberties group, has called for limits on the collection and use of that information. It says the Federal Aviation Administration, which is in charge of air safety, should demand a “data collection statement” from each company or agency that wants to use a drone, with details on what information is collected and for what purpose. Moreover, if police agencies use drones, the group said in a recent blog post, they should limit the collection of information to specific cases and not collect vast troves of data on people and communities. The data, it said, should be kept for as little time as possible.

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/20/drones-may-set-off-a-flurry-of-lawsuits/

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati

3 Responses to Drones May Set Off a Flurry of Lawsuits

  1. Patrick Egan on 21 February 2012 at 6:01 am

    Funny, it’s been going on for years and no one noticed.

  2. Paul Marsh on 21 February 2012 at 1:10 pm

    I wonder if the average person knows that the USGS has been photographing our back yards, at all sorts of angles, from airplanes for years? (Not that it really matters with regard to privacy, but those close-up photos used by BingMaps don’t come from satellites.) It’s not the same as a UAV that can loiter with a purpose, but still, where’s the outcry? We’ve seen (supposedly) Bill Gates on a lounge chair in his backyard, all of the planes and cars parked at, if not owned by, John Travolta, etc. etc. I’m not too worried about UAVs being grounded before or after they figure out how to put them in the NAS safely. Cooler heads will prevail.

  3. Paul Marsh on 21 February 2012 at 1:12 pm

    … parked at John Travolta’s house…(but I’m sure you know what I meant.)

Listen to internet radio with sUAS News on Blog Talk Radio

FAA miss-O-matic

  • NPRM :
    1 year, 6 months, 7 days, 22 hours, 10 minutes ago
  • FAA test sites:
    9 months, 8 days, 22 hours, 10 minutes ago
Search the full text of our books:


Daily sUAS Email update

join our mailing list
* indicates required
HTML tutorial